Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dcl.init.ref, over.ics.ref, over.ics.rank] Avoid saying function lvalue #6713

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes cplusplus/CWG#469.

Note that we can simplify the wording in [over.ics.ref] p3 by the fact that an lvalue is of either an object type or a function type.

Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@tkoeppe, how would you like to proceed?

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Dec 18, 2023

@jensmaurer We can apply this if you think it's fine from a Core perspective.

Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tkoeppe , I think this is editorially-ok from a CWG perspective.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Apr 16, 2024

OK, then off we go -- thanks!

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 2a07c13 into cplusplus:main Apr 16, 2024
2 checks passed
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the function-lvalue branch April 16, 2024 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[intro.defs] Adding definition for the term function lvalue
3 participants