Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[expr] Missing definition of "operand" (other than "unevaluated operand") #6749

Open
frederick-vs-ja opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[expr] Missing definition of "operand" (other than "unevaluated operand") #6749

frederick-vs-ja opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

As reflected in cplusplus/CWG#371, it seems that the definition of the term operand is missing, and currently only unevaluated operand is defined in [expr.context].

It seems to possible to me to add the definition editorially.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@frederick-vs-ja