Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

implementation-defined vs. implementation defined vs. impldef #687

Closed
burblebee opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

implementation-defined vs. implementation defined vs. impldef #687

burblebee opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@burblebee
Copy link
Contributor

The spec is inconsistent in the text for implementation-defined wording. Some use the impldef reference, some use implementation-defined, and some use implementation defined. It is also inconsistent in whether or not an index accompanies the implementation-defined text.
@burblebee burblebee mentioned this issue Apr 13, 2016
Closed
@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

The missing index entries are covered by issue #98.

@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

I believe this is mostly resolved by #899?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@zygoloid @AlisdairM @burblebee