New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
grammar terms aren't \grammarterm'd #701
Comments
jensmaurer
added a commit
to jensmaurer/draft
that referenced
this issue
Dec 21, 2016
with \grammarterm or \defn/x as appropriate. Also add an index entry. Partially addresses cplusplus#701. Partially addresses cplusplus#329.
jensmaurer
added a commit
to jensmaurer/draft
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2017
with \grammarterm or \defn/x as appropriate. Also add an index entry. Partially addresses cplusplus#701. Partially addresses cplusplus#329.
jensmaurer
added a commit
to jensmaurer/draft
that referenced
this issue
Jan 10, 2017
with \grammarterm or \defn/x as appropriate. Also add an index entry. Partially addresses cplusplus#701. Partially addresses cplusplus#329.
How much of this is still a problem? |
still shows a few (very few) occurrences that need fixing (assuming that grammarterms often have a hyphen in their spelling). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Many references to grammar terms defined in [lex](such as digit) are formatted in roman rather than italics. This issue is cloned from #296 for the other grammar terms mentioned in that issue.
Note that we have separate issues for:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: