Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

grammar terms aren't \grammarterm'd #701

Closed
burblebee opened this issue Apr 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

grammar terms aren't \grammarterm'd #701

burblebee opened this issue Apr 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@burblebee
Copy link
Contributor

Many references to grammar terms defined in [lex](such as digit) are formatted in roman rather than italics. This issue is cloned from #296 for the other grammar terms mentioned in that issue.

Note that we have separate issues for:

jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2016
with \grammarterm or \defn/x as appropriate.

Also add an index entry.

Partially addresses cplusplus#701.
Partially addresses cplusplus#329.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2017
with \grammarterm or \defn/x as appropriate.

Also add an index entry.

Partially addresses cplusplus#701.
Partially addresses cplusplus#329.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2017
with \grammarterm or \defn/x as appropriate.

Also add an index entry.

Partially addresses cplusplus#701.
Partially addresses cplusplus#329.
tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2017
… as appropriate. (#1286)

Also add an index entry.

Partially addresses #701.
Partially addresses #329.
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Feb 5, 2017

How much of this is still a problem?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

grep -- - *.tex | fgrep -w '\term'

still shows a few (very few) occurrences that need fixing (assuming that grammarterms often have a hyphen in their spelling).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants