Skip to content

[except.ctor] Retitle subclause as 'stack unwinding' #7282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

The purpose of this subclause is to define stack unwinding, which in specified in terms of the lifetime of objects, not just class types. Hence, while much of the text is addressing interactions with contructors and destructors (the original subclause title) it does more than just that.

The purpose of this subclause is to define stack unwinding,
which in specified in terms of the lifetime of objects, not
just class types.  Hence, while much of the text is addressing
interactions with contructors and destructors (the original
subclause title) it does more than just that.
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Oct 14, 2024

No objections from CWG.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer merged commit 3982d5d into cplusplus:main Oct 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the name_stack_unwinding branch October 14, 2024 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants