We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Throughout 29.9, the following types are linear algebra value type:
The incoming paper (P1673R13) said "linear algebra value types" here, plural. The 's' has been lost as a consequence of the defnadjx macro:
defnadjx
\pnum Throughout \ref{linalg}, the following types are \defnadjx{linear algebra}{value type}{linear algebra value types}:
I'm not sure how to fix that without altering the index entries ... although they seem kinda messed up anyway:
@jensmaurer what was the intention here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should it be: \defnadjx{linear algebra}{value types}{value type}:?
\defnadjx{linear algebra}{value types}{value type}:
Sorry, something went wrong.
We want the singular index entry and the plural display in the running text. Looks like I messed up the use of the macro.
Feel free to just push the change!
#7374
No branches or pull requests
The incoming paper (P1673R13) said "linear algebra value types" here, plural. The 's' has been lost as a consequence of the
defnadjx
macro:I'm not sure how to fix that without altering the index entries ... although they seem kinda messed up anyway:
@jensmaurer what was the intention here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: