Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[string.view.comparison] Fix index for basic_string_view operators #739

Merged

Conversation

AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

The first issue is that operator<< does not group in the index with
other definitions for operator<<, which use an index key of
operator\shl.

The second issue is that operator<< was the only operator indexed
under the 'basic_string_view' key, where the precedent fro basic_string
and other types is that the free-function operators are still indexed
under their respective class entry.

The first issue is that operator<< does not group in the index with
other definitions for operator<<, which use an index key of
operator\shl.

The second issue is that operator<< was the only operator indexed
under the 'basic_string_view' key, where the precedent fro basic_string
and other types is that the free-function operators are still indexed
under their respective class entry.
@jwakely jwakely merged commit 6f8631d into cplusplus:master Jun 8, 2016
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the fix_index_for_string_view_operator branch June 8, 2016 14:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants