Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[strings,containers] Add iterators to index of implemenetation define… #754

Conversation

AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

@AlisdairM AlisdairM commented Jun 14, 2016

Add iterators to index of implemenetation defined behavior

This patch slavishly copies the tag used for array::iterator, without
understanding if a better markup might be available. One consequence
is that we get two entries for basic_string_view::const_iterator.
Another is that the index around type names appears as two sorted
subsequences, rather than one sorted sequence.

An additional patch will follow for the remaining implementation-defined
types that are not present in the index, once the preferred markup is
reviewed in this pull request.

…d behavior

This patch slavishly copies the tag used for array::iterator, without
understanding if a better markup might be available.  One consequence
is that we get two entries for basic_string_view::const_iterator.
Another is that the index around type names appears as two sorted
subsequences, rather than one sorted sequence.

An additional patch will follow for the remaining implementation-defined
types that are not present in the index, once the preferred markup is
reviewed in this pull request.
@zygoloid zygoloid merged commit bc0e41a into cplusplus:master Jun 22, 2016
@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

The index collation issues are pre-existing; we can fix those separately.

FrankHB pushed a commit to FrankHB/draft that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2016
…d behavior (cplusplus#754)

This patch slavishly copies the tag used for array::iterator, without
understanding if a better markup might be available.  One consequence
is that we get two entries for basic_string_view::const_iterator.
Another is that the index around type names appears as two sorted
subsequences, rather than one sorted sequence.

An additional patch will follow for the remaining implementation-defined
types that are not present in the index, once the preferred markup is
reviewed in this pull request.
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the add_container_iterators_to_imp_defined_index branch August 8, 2016 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants