For example "a_eq.insert(t)" -> "a_-\neq.insert(t)"

Forwarded to LWG.

Are there any requirement tables that don't have awful formatting? :-)

I have an attempt here to re-layout the tables into paragraphs. I'm waiting for @zygoloid's response.

Our preference is to move away from tables for requirements for C++20.

Here is an example of a different way to present requirements. The example replaces Table 86 in [container.requirements.general]:

The code lives in https://github.com/tkoeppe/draft/tree/table_to_paragraph

Editorial meeting consensus: Present Thomas' bulleted rewrite to LWG for comment.

Sent to -lib reflector for feedback.

I really hope we can make some progress with this for C++20. There's good guidance from @geoffromer on the reflector, @tkoeppe needs to do some work here.

For reference, the reflector thread is http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2018/01/5041.php

any update?

Not happening for C++20. Retargeting.

Resumed by Jens's effort in #4460.

@jensmaurer: I take it we can close this now? :-)

Yes. I've also added a link to the pull request.