[gram] Change "syntax" to "grammar". #790
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Annex A is a summary of grammar, but not only syntactic grammar. Even in contexts without need of grammatical disambiguation, pure syntactically handling (reduction merely based on parsing of the token stream without semantic information) of several context-sensitive constructs (e.g. constant-expression and several kinds of type-id) has already been insufficient. Since the remained difference is acknowledged in the same paragraph, I think my change is also editorial. (On the contrary, ISO C may have more problems because it uses "syntax" everywhere.)
However, I have no idea to change
\indextext{summary!syntax}
...