Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent formatting of cv-qualified #798

Closed
jwakely opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Inconsistent formatting of cv-qualified #798

jwakely opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Jul 6, 2016

The core and library clauses oscillate between cv-qualified, cv-qualified and (in one case) cv-qualified.

The library is also inconsistent about parenthesising "possibly cv-qualified".

@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

I got some guidance from @zygoloid regarding this on a recent pull request #684 :
"cv should not be italicized except when referencing a metavariable representing a set of cv-qualifiers. That is: "cv-qualified" means "qualified with the set of qualifiers named cv", whereas "cv-qualified" means "qualified with some unspecified cv-qualifiers". See [basic.type.qualifier]/5."

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the big An issue causing a large set of changes, scattered across most of the text. label Nov 13, 2016
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2016
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the big An issue causing a large set of changes, scattered across most of the text. label Nov 13, 2016
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Nov 13, 2016
tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants