We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The order of template parameters in
template <class U, class T, class ...Args> any make_any(initializer_list<U>, Args&& ...args);
seems clearly broken. Can this be handled editorially, or should I send this to LWG?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think that can be fixed editorially, because the proposal contradicts itself. The synopsis has the wrong parameter order but the spec for that function has it right. That fits the following criterion from https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/wiki/How-to-tell-if-an-issue-is-editorial
Internal inconsistencies (e.g. two different declarations for the same function overload, when it is clear which is the correct declaration)
Sorry, something went wrong.
73b8f1a
No branches or pull requests
The order of template parameters in
seems clearly broken. Can this be handled editorially, or should I send this to LWG?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: