Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"constexpr constructor" and "constexpr function" are defined terms and should not be formatted in code font #825

Closed
zygoloid opened this issue Jul 12, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

Some of the references to the defined terms "constexpr constructor" and "constexpr function" incorrectly use code font for the "constexpr" keyword. (We probably make this mistake for some other terms that include keywords, too.)

@jwakely
Copy link
Member

jwakely commented Jul 12, 2016

I wondered about this while applying the recent motions and followed the lead of [expr.const] which uses code font consistently. Getting it right there would set a good example :)

@jlaire
Copy link

jlaire commented Nov 29, 2016

This seems to be a duplicate of #559 (which is tagged "decision-required).

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Nov 29, 2016

@jensmaurer: Could you please have a look at both issues?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

I've closed #559 as a duplicate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants