We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[futures.overview] says:
The enum type launch is a bitmask type (17.5.2.1.3) with launch::async and launch::deferred denoting individual bits.
In Clause 17 [bitmask.types] defines the term "bitmask element" for values that denote individual bits. We should use that term.
[futures.async] says:
if policy & launch::async is non-zero [...] if policy & launch::deferred is non-zero
[bitmask.types] defines terms for that, we could say "if launch::async is set in policy" and "if launch::deferred is set in policy".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[futures.overview], [futures.async] Use 'bitmask type' terminology.
ea0cb6c
Fixes cplusplus#826.
[futures.overview], [futures.async] Use 'bitmask type' terminology. (#…
5bb341b
…1095) Fixes #826.
jensmaurer
No branches or pull requests
[futures.overview] says:
In Clause 17 [bitmask.types] defines the term "bitmask element" for values that denote individual bits. We should use that term.
[futures.async] says:
[bitmask.types] defines terms for that, we could say "if launch::async is set in policy" and "if launch::deferred is set in policy".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: