[diagnostics] audit index entries for clause 19 #829
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The only issues that turned up are missing '%' continuations at the end of around half of the index entry lines. This patch consistently cleans that up, so that every index entry terminates in a '%', but it is not clear that this has any effect on the final rendering, and the patch could safely be rejected. The primary benefit is consistency, should we ever want to write some follow-up tooling to analyze index entries.
|
You could run |
|
OK, no diffs. I have no particular opinion on this change, but I suppose it can't hurt, and it's "leading by example" regarding consistency. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The only issues that turned up are missing '%' continuations
at the end of around half of the index entry lines. This
patch consistently cleans that up, so that every index entry
terminates in a '%', but it is not clear that this has any
effect on the final rendering, and the patch could safely be
rejected. The primary benefit is consistency, should we ever
want to write some follow-up tooling to analyze index entries.
Audit confirmed that every \begin{itemdecl} is indexed, and the
index entry matches the declared name(s).