Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[set.cons, multiset.cons] Specify correct constructed type and add missing \tcode. #896

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 6, 2016

Conversation

Eelis
Copy link
Contributor

@Eelis Eelis commented Aug 6, 2016

No description provided.

@Eelis Eelis changed the title [set.cons] Add missing \tcode. [set.cons, multiset.cons] Specify correct constructed type and add missing \tcode. Aug 6, 2016
@@ -6946,7 +6946,7 @@
\begin{itemdescr}
\pnum
\effects
Constructs an empty set using the specified comparison objects and allocator.
Constructs an empty \tcode{set} using the specified comparison objects and allocator.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe the original wording may be as intended here. We also say "map" elsewhere to refer to both ordered and unordered maps. It seems OK to use the abstract concept rather than the C++ typename here. I'd leave it as it is.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, the second std::set constructor in [set.cons] /does/ have the \tcode. I was merely trying to make it consistent.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I see. That's fine then. Thanks.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 0a08f81 into cplusplus:master Aug 6, 2016
@Eelis Eelis deleted the tcode branch August 6, 2016 23:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants