Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[over.ics.rank]/3 Horrible nested sub-bullets #90

Open
sdutoit opened this issue Apr 25, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

[over.ics.rank]/3 Horrible nested sub-bullets #90

sdutoit opened this issue Apr 25, 2013 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG.

Comments

@sdutoit
Copy link
Contributor

sdutoit commented Apr 25, 2013

The formatting is a mess here (examples nested in nested bullets, sentences ending with a period but then continuing with "or, if not that"), etc...

@zygoloid zygoloid added the cwg label Jun 18, 2014
@zygoloid zygoloid self-assigned this Jun 18, 2014
tkoeppe added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2017
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Jan 18, 2017

I submitted 417d713, which fixes the premature ends of sentences.

Apart from that, I don't think the situation is all that bad. There are only two nesting levels of lists (we've done much worse for less), and the placement of the examples isn't awful.

Even if you replaced the outer list by a sequence of paragraphs, you'd still have to deal with the examples in the inner list items, and short of making everything a long, flat list of paragraphs, I'm not sure how this could be improved.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@tkoeppe: Agreed with your conclusion. Let's close this.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. label Jan 18, 2017
@tkoeppe tkoeppe changed the title [over.ics.rank]/4 Horrible nested sub-bullets [over.ics.rank]/3 Horrible nested sub-bullets Mar 2, 2017
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Editorial meeting consensus: The remaining "or if not that" are wrong; we should say something like "if the previous bullet did not yield a comparison result both ways".

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed decision-required A decision of the editorial group (or the Project Editor) is required. formatting labels Mar 2, 2017
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the C++20 milestone Mar 2, 2017
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the C++20 milestone Feb 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants