Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reword implementation-defined nature of <> and "" for #include #928

Open
AlisdairM opened this issue Sep 23, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Reword implementation-defined nature of <> and "" for #include #928

AlisdairM opened this issue Sep 23, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

The implementation-defined nature of the contents for #include directives vary slightly, depending on whether "" or <> form is used. However, the term 'implementation-defined' is used for only the first form, and the second merely augments it. This makes it tricky to create meaningful cross-references in the index of implementation-defined behaviors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant