Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[lex.literal] consistent indexing of prefix and suffix #932

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 12, 2016

Conversation

AlisdairM
Copy link
Contributor

Provide a consistent indexing of integer, character, and string
literals - particularly regarding prefix and suffix entries that
were not completely indexed before.

@AlisdairM AlisdairM force-pushed the consistent_indexing_of_literals branch from 0e7611d to 6aa921f Compare November 12, 2016 07:23
@@ -876,6 +876,11 @@
\indextext{literal!decimal}%
\indextext{literal!hexadecimal}%
\indextext{literal!base~of integer}%
\indextext{prefix!\idxcode{0}}%
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't add the prefix index entries. Everything else is fine.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect, thanks!

Provide a consistent indexing of integer, character, and string
literals - particularly regarding prefix and suffix entries that
were not completely indexed before.
As requested by editor review, but retaining the
character/string literal prefixes, as 'L' prefix
is already indexed in this manner.
@AlisdairM AlisdairM force-pushed the consistent_indexing_of_literals branch from 6aa921f to aa9b5d4 Compare November 12, 2016 16:26
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 364c962 into cplusplus:master Nov 12, 2016
@AlisdairM AlisdairM deleted the consistent_indexing_of_literals branch November 12, 2016 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants