Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[basic.def.odr] brittle and broken count of bullets in normative text #944

Closed
hubert-reinterpretcast opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

[basic.def.odr] brittle and broken count of bullets in normative text #944

hubert-reinterpretcast opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@hubert-reinterpretcast
Copy link
Contributor

In N4604 subclause 3.2 [basic.def.odr] paragraph 6, bullet 6.5:

[ ... ] that is, the default argument is subject to the three requirements described above [ ... ]

the "three requirements" presumably refer to bullets 6.1 through 6.4.
@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

zygoloid commented Nov 9, 2016

It's worse than that:

the default argument is subject to the three requirements described above (and, if the default argument has sub-expressions with default arguments, this requirement applies recursively).

So it's actually referring to bullets 6.1 through 6.5!

jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2016
@jensmaurer
[basic.def.odr] Avoid counting bullets in normative text.
7fb084e 
Fixes cplusplus#944.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Nov 23, 2016
Merged
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Nov 23, 2016
tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2016
@jensmaurer @tkoeppe
[basic.def.odr] Avoid counting the number of bullets in normative text (
37073d6 
#1109)

Fixes #944.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@zygoloid @hubert-reinterpretcast @jensmaurer