New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistency in [expr.ass] and [intro.execution] #953
Comments
It seems we've overlooked this example when we applied Gaby's order-of-initialization paper. |
jensmaurer
added a commit
to jensmaurer/draft
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2016
expressions. Fixes cplusplus#953.
tkoeppe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2016
it's very helpful to me! |
it's very helpful to me! btw, the issuer is soooooo lovely, cute, supercalifragilisticexpialidocious in real world. |
it's very helpful to me! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
[expr.ass]/1:
[intro.execution]/15:
With the assignment being sequenced after the value
computation of the right and left operands, why is i = v[i++] and i = i++ + 1 undefined behavior?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: