Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

After applying CWG1860, replace "anonymous union" and "anonymous union member" with "anonymous union object" where relevant #973

Closed
zygoloid opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

After applying CWG1860, replace "anonymous union" and "anonymous union member" with "anonymous union object" where relevant #973

zygoloid opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

zygoloid commented Nov 9, 2016

CWG1860 introduces the term "anonymous union object" for the object (or class member) implicitly declared by an anonymous union declaration. We should update existing woolly references to that object to use the defined term.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Dec 1, 2017
Closed
@jensmaurer jensmaurer self-assigned this Dec 1, 2017
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Editorial meeting consensus: not a net improvement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zygoloid @jensmaurer