This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
P(i)Section: 31.5.3.2 [fpos.operations] Status: Resolved Submitter: Jens Maurer Opened: 2016-11-24 Last modified: 2020-05-12
Priority: 3
View all other issues in [fpos.operations].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
This is from editorial issue #1031.
The first row in Table 112 "Position type requirements" talks about the expressionP(i) and then has an assertion
p == P(i). However, there are no constraints on p
other than being of type P, so (on the face of it) this
seems to require that operator== on P always returns
true, which is non-sensical.
[2017-01-27 Telecon]
Priority 3
[2019-03-17; Daniel comments]
With the acceptance of P0759R1 at the Rapperswil 2018 meeting this issue should be closed as Resolved.
[2020-05-12; Reflector discussions]
Resolved by P0759R1.
Rationale:
Resolved by P0759R1.Proposed resolution: