Skip to content

P2499 string_view range constructor should be explicit #1158

New issue
New issue
Closed
cplusplus/draft
#5688
Closed
P2499 string_view range constructor should be explicit#1158
cplusplus/draft
#5688
Labels
C++23Targeted at C++23ISShip vehicle: ISLWGLibraryplenary-approvedPapers approved for inclusion in their target vehicle by plenary vote.rangesstd::rangestentatively-ready-for-plenaryReviewed between meetings; ready for a vote.
Milestone
 
2022-telecon
@wg21bot

Description

@wg21bot
wg21bot
opened on Dec 18, 2021
Collaborator

P2499R0 string_view range constructor should be explicit (James Touton)

Activity

wg21bot
added
LEWGLibrary Evolution
on Dec 18, 2021
wg21bot
added this to the 2021-telecon milestone on Dec 18, 2021
inbal2l
added
rangesstd::ranges
SG9Ranges SG
ready-for-library-evolution-mailing-list-reviewThis paper needs to be discussed on the Library Evolution mailing list
on Dec 18, 2021
brycelelbach
added
B2 - improvementBucket 2 as described by P0592: bug fixes, performance improvements, integration fixes for/between e
C++23Targeted at C++23
C++26Targeted at C++26
ISShip vehicle: IS
size - tinypaper size estimate, smaller than small
scheduled-for-library-evolutionThis paper has been scheduled for one of the groups: LEWG, LEWG Incubator, or a Mailing List review
and removed
C++23Targeted at C++23
on Dec 22, 2021
inbal2l
removed
scheduled-for-library-evolutionThis paper has been scheduled for one of the groups: LEWG, LEWG Incubator, or a Mailing List review
SG9Ranges SG
on Dec 22, 2021
jensmaurer
removed this from the 2021-telecon milestone on Jan 1, 2022

17 remaining items

brycelelbach
added
LWGLibrary
lwg-pendingLWG Chair needs to disposition
and removed
scheduled-for-library-evolutionThis paper has been scheduled for one of the groups: LEWG, LEWG Incubator, or a Mailing List review
on Jun 19, 2022
brycelelbach

brycelelbach commented on Jun 19, 2022

@brycelelbach
brycelelbach
on Jun 19, 2022

2022-05 Library Evolution Electronic Poll Outcomes

POLL: Send [P2499R0] string_view Range Constructor Should Be Explicit to Library Working Group for C++23, classified as an improvement of an existing feature ([P0592R4] bucket 2 item).

Strongly Favor Weakly Favor Neutral Weakly Against Strongly Against
13 7 1 2 0

Consensus in favor.

brycelelbach
removed
LEWGLibrary Evolution
on Jun 19, 2022
JeffGarland
added
lwg-fullreviewPaper is ready for lwg full group review
and removed
lwg-pendingLWG Chair needs to disposition
on Jul 4, 2022
JeffGarland

JeffGarland commented on Jul 8, 2022

@JeffGarland
JeffGarland
on Jul 8, 2022
Member

LWG reviewed and approved 2022-07-08
Notes: https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2022/P2499-20220708

poll: Put P2499r0 into C++23

F A N
16 0 1
JeffGarland
added
tentatively-ready-for-plenaryReviewed between meetings; ready for a vote.
and removed
lwg-fullreviewPaper is ready for lwg full group review
B2 - improvementBucket 2 as described by P0592: bug fixes, performance improvements, integration fixes for/between e
size - tinypaper size estimate, smaller than small
on Jul 8, 2022
cor3ntin
added
plenary-approvedPapers approved for inclusion in their target vehicle by plenary vote.
on Jul 25, 2022
jensmaurer
mentioned this on Jul 29, 2022
tkoeppe
closed this as completedin #5688on Aug 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    C++23Targeted at C++23ISShip vehicle: ISLWGLibraryplenary-approvedPapers approved for inclusion in their target vehicle by plenary vote.rangesstd::rangestentatively-ready-for-plenaryReviewed between meetings; ready for a vote.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      Participants

      @brycelelbach@vitaut@Bekenn@cor3ntin@JeffGarland

      Issue actions
        P2499 string_view range constructor should be explicit · Issue #1158 · cplusplus/papers